Danny Defends Argon Dating

This false notion is often promoted when radioactive dates are listed with utterly unrealistic error bars. In this report , for example, we are told that using one radioactive dating technique, a lunar rock sample is 4, million years old, plus or minus 23 million years old. Of course, that error estimate is complete nonsense. It refers to one specific source of error — the uncertainty in the measurement of the amounts of various atoms used in the analysis. Most likely, that is the least important source of error. If those rocks really have been sitting around on the moon for billions of years, I suspect that the the wide range of physical and chemical processes which occurred over that time period had a much more profound effect on the uncertainty of the age determination. This is best illustrated by the radioactive age of a sample of diamonds from Zaire. Their age was measured to be 6.

Chalcophile Elements and Sulfides in the Upper Mantle

Outlook Other Abstract U-Pb radioisotope dating is now the absolute dating method of first choice among geochronologists, especially using the mineral zircon. A variety of analytical instruments have also now been developed using different micro-sampling techniques coupled with mass spectrometers, thus enabling wide usage of U-Pb radioisotope dating.

However, problems remain in the interpretation of the measured Pb isotopic ratios to transform them into ages.

How radiometric dating works in general: Radioactive elements decay gradually into other elements. The original element is called the parent, and the result of the decay process is .

The Grand Canyon as a Creationist Clock By Ryan McGillivray When asked to imagine the biggest, deepest, longest canyon one can imagine, an image of the Grand Canyon will often pop into a person’s mind. The Grand Canyon is a site of almost unfathomable grandeur, which inspires awe in anyone who sees it. Lately, however, the canyon has also inspired controversy, specifically over its origins.

It is generally held by the scientific community that the Grand Canyon formed by the slow erosion of the Colorado River over millions of years. Steve Austin, however, has proposed an entirely different theory on the age and formation of the canyon and wrote a book explaining his theories titled Grand Canyon: Austin believes that the canyon was formed extremely rapidly during the period immediately following the global flood of Noah in the biblical book of Genesis.

Austin proposed that the canyon is thousands, not millions of years old. This fits into the larger field of Creation Science, in which people try to prove with scientific evidence that the world is only 6, years old. This paper will summarize Dr. Austin’s claims and delve into the evidence he uses to support them by examining his book. Austin supports his claim with theories of rapid erosion and Flood deposition of fossils.

He also addresses issues like radiometric dating, in which he attempts to cast doubt on established scientific methods of dating Earth’s features. Austin’s findings became one basis for the RATE project, a creation science team aimed at proving the pitfalls and inadequacies of radiometric dating techniques.

Historical Geology/Other isochron methods

His calculations did not account for heat produced via radioactive decay a process then unknown to science or, more significantly, convection inside the Earth, which allows more heat to escape from the interior to warm rocks near the surface. For biologists, even million years seemed much too short to be plausible. In Darwin’s theory of evolution , the process of random heritable variation with cumulative selection requires great durations of time.

According to modern biology, the total evolutionary history from the beginning of life to today has taken place since 3.

Examines the last two decades’ advances in analyzing and understanding the formation of natural diamonds, and their relation to the earth’s formation.

Images Radioactive decay All ordinary matter is made up of combinations of chemical elements , each with its own atomic number , indicating the number of protons in the atomic nucleus. Elements exist in different isotopes , with each isotope of an element differing in the number of neutrons in the nucleus. A particular isotope of a particular element is called a nuclide.

Some nuclides are naturally unstable. That is, at some point in time, an atom of such a nuclide will spontaneously change into a different nuclide by radioactive decay. The decay may happen by emission of particles usually electrons beta decay , positrons or alpha particles or by spontaneous nuclear fission , and electron capture. The age is calculated from the slope of the isochron line and the original composition from the intercept of the isochron with the y-axis.

The mathematical expression that relates radioactive decay to geologic time is:

Scientist Realizes Important Flaw in Radioactive Dating

Radioactive decay[ change change source ] All ordinary matter is made up of combinations of chemical elements , each with its own atomic number , indicating the number of protons in the atomic nucleus. Elements exist in different isotopes , with each isotope of an element differing in the number of neutrons in the nucleus. A particular isotope of a particular element is called a nuclide.

Some nuclides are naturally unstable. That is, at some point in time, an atom of such a nuclide will spontaneously change into a different nuclide by radioactive decay.

リンク(Links): 文献(おもに図書): 広島大学図書館にない場合(OPACから見つからない場合)、授業受講者には貸し出します。.

The isochron method Many radioactive dating methods are based on minute additions of daughter products to a rock or mineral in which a considerable amount of daughter-type isotopes already exists. These isotopes did not come from radioactive decay in the system but rather formed during the original creation of the elements. In this case, it is a big advantage to present the data in a form in which the abundance of both the parent and daughter isotopes are given with respect to the abundance of the initial background daughter.

The incremental additions of the daughter type can then be viewed in proportion to the abundance of parent atoms. In mathematical terms this is achieved as follows. This term, shown in Figure 1, is called the initial ratio. The slope is proportional to the geologic age of the system. In practice, the isochron approach has many inherent advantages. When a single body of liquid rock crystallizes, parent and daughter elements may separate so that, once solid, the isotopic data would define a series of points, such as those shown as open circles designated R1, R2, R3 in Figure 1.

With time each would then develop additional daughter abundances in proportion to the amount of parent present.

Samarium–neodymium dating

Sm-Nd radiometric dating Samarium has five naturally occurring isotopes and neodymium has seven. The two elements are joined in a parent-daughter relationship by the alpha-decay of Sm to Nd with a half life of 1. An isochron is calculated normally. Sm and Nd geochemistry The concentration of Sm and Nd in silicate minerals increase with the order in which they crystallise from a magma according to Bowen’s reaction series.

Samarium is accommodated more easily into mafic minerals, so a mafic rock which crystallises mafic minerals will concentrate neodymium in the melt phase faster relative to samarium.


These are K-Ar data obtained on glauconite, a potassium-bearing clay mineral that forms in some marine sediment. Woodmorappe fails to mention, however, that these data were obtained as part of a controlled experiment to test, on samples of known age, the applicability of the K-Ar method to glauconite and to illite, another clay mineral. He also neglects to mention that most of the 89 K-Ar ages reported in their study agree very well with the expected ages.

Evernden and others 43 found that these clay minerals are extremely susceptible to argon loss when heated even slightly, such as occurs when sedimentary rocks are deeply buried. As a result, glauconite is used for dating only with extreme caution. The ages from the Coast Range batholith in Alaska Table 2 are referenced by Woodmorappe to a report by Lanphere and others Whereas Lanphere and his colleagues referred to these two K-Ar ages of and million years, the ages are actually from another report and were obtained from samples collected at two localities in Canada, not Alaska.

There is nothing wrong with these ages; they are consistent with the known geologic relations and represent the crystallization ages of the Canadian samples. The Liberian example Table 2 is from a report by Dalrymple and others These authors studied dikes of basalt that intruded Precambrian crystalline basement rocks and Mesozoic sedimentary rocks in western Liberia. The dikes cutting the Precambrian basement gave K-Ar ages ranging from to million years Woodmorappe erroneously lists this higher age as million years , whereas those cutting the Mesozoic sedimentary rocks gave K-Ar ages of from to million years.

How Old is the Earth

In order to be used as a natural clock to calculate the age of the earth, the processes generating lead isotopes must meet the four conditions of a natural clock: Dalrymple cites examples of lead isotope dating that give an age for the earth of about 4. Lead isotopes are important because two different lead isotopes Pb and Pb are produced from the decay series of two different uranium isotopes U and U.

The age of the Earth is ± billion years ( × 10 9 years ± 1%). This age may represent the age of the Earth’s accretion, of core formation, or of the material from which the Earth formed. This dating is based on evidence from radiometric age-dating of meteorite material and is consistent with the radiometric ages of the oldest-known terrestrial and lunar samples.

Using modern equipment and instruments, the technicians have made considerable progress in the development of innovative analytical methods and new technical investigations, which have, in turn, been widely applied by scientists around the world. The method of in situ simultaneous determination of trace elements i. In situ Sr-Nd isotopic analysis of single minerals, such as plagioclase, calcite, titanite, apatite, perovskite and monazite, give the MC-ICPMS laboratory unique abilities.

Eudialyte is the only mineral that may be used for in situ simultaneous determination of trace elements i. Moreover, this method may also be used for the dating of accessory minerals of a younger age in thin sections without external standardization. This technique has been applied to fine-grained accessory minerals found in meteorite. The possibility of young baddeleyite dating by SIMS has become a reality, and therefore, the technical problems of basic and ultrabasic rock dating have been solved.

The study of reference materials for in situ isotopic ratio measurement Reference materials form the basis of in situ analysis. As analysis and testing in China are always carried out based on international reference materials, Chinese geologists have depended on international reference materials for many years.

Radiometric dating

Godthelp in Hill, Robert S. White, , The Nature of Hidden Worlds: Australian Conservation Foundation, Melbourne. Michael Archer, Suzanne J.

The Planetary and Space Science Centre (PASSC) opened in April, and was the first facility of its kind in Canada.

See this page in: Hungarian , Russian , Spanish People who ask about carbon 14C dating usually want to know about the radiometric [1] dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years. People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history.

Clearly, such huge time periods cannot be fitted into the Bible without compromising what the Bible says about the goodness of God and the origin of sin, death and suffering —the reason Jesus came into the world See Six Days? Christians , by definition, take the statements of Jesus Christ seriously. This only makes sense with a time-line beginning with the creation week thousands of years ago.

It makes no sense at all if man appeared at the end of billions of years. We will deal with carbon dating first and then with the other dating methods. How the carbon clock works Carbon has unique properties that are essential for life on Earth. One rare form has atoms that are 14 times as heavy as hydrogen atoms: Carbon is made when cosmic rays knock neutrons out of atomic nuclei in the upper atmosphere.

These displaced neutrons, now moving fast, hit ordinary nitrogen 14N at lower altitudes, converting it into 14C. Unlike common carbon 12C , 14C is unstable and slowly decays, changing it back to nitrogen and releasing energy. This instability makes it radioactive.

How accurate are Carbon-14 and other radioactive dating methods?

Zircons found from grains in Western Australia are considered slightly older – 4. Geologists depend on radiometric age dating to give dates to different strata and the rocks and bones and artifacts found in those layers. Most will say that the dating methods have been confirmed over and over again, but there are questions about whether the dating methods used are reliable and whether they give scientists true dates – or whether they give dates that fit those secular geologists’ preconceived ideas.

During its history, the earth has suffered constant change. Erosion, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, catastrophes change the surface of the earth, melting rocks, grinding them up and spitting them back out in different forms than they had when they started. Those who trust in radiometric dating methods point to G.

Geochronology. Ages of geological formations or secondary events (i.e. alteration or metamorphism) can be determined through using K-Ar, (Ar-Ar), U-Pb, Rb-Sr or the Sm-Nd dating methods.

Kordination der Finanzierung, Logistik, und wissenschaftlichen Auswertung des Bohrprojektes insges. Koordination der Impaktaspekte sowie Organisation und Koordination des Gesamtprojektes ca. Books and Edited Volumes Koeberl, C. Special Section, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 55, p. Koeberl, C, and Anderson, R. Gefahr aus dem All. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, Vol. Translated from the German.

Evolution of the Solar System Inferred from Sm Nd Isotopic Studies – Lars Borg (SETI Talks 2016)